Leadership Changeassessing senior readiness[ Return to the previous page ] |
|
|
We see problem solving and leadership as flip sides of the same coin. The leadership side can be demanding, and not every senior team will find the shift comfortable The purpose of this page is to outline some of the changes that would eventually be required from senior leadership if the shift to more robust problem solving is to be durable. |
|
Vision and Mission |
Use the vision, mission, and strategic plan
of the organization to identify issues
worth attention; resist the pressure to
define the senior agenda based on the "squeakiest
wheel" or the loudest client. |
Long term vs. Short term |
Be explicit and public about managing the
conflict between attending to the present
problems vs. taking care of the long view.
Remind people frequently that exclusive
attention to only one side of the dilemma
is a serious failing. Ask after the long-term
consequences of short-term decisions. |
Identify problem types, not details |
Rather than asking for details about problems
brought to your attention, ask only enough
to determine the fundamental type of the
problem. |
Use the problem type |
Use the problem type to craft
the charter to the organization. Return
responsibility for the problem back to
the staff group closest to the situation.
Resist the temptation to use your authority
to impose solutions when others are more
intimate with the details than you. |
Key executive conversations |
Periodically check with those working on problems.
Ask (1) if they are still confident of
the original problem typing, and whether
the charter still makes sense. Ask (2)
if the possible solutions cast doubt on
the decision to address the problem at
all. |
Model the model |
Demonstrate through your actions and decisions
that thorough problem solving is a basic
expectations. Use the model explicitly,
and ask others to use it in their work. |
The senior team |
Take responsibility -- collectively and individually -- for the health of the senior team. The quality of conversation and decision making will become the upper limit of problem solving deeper down in the organization. This can be a difficult challenge. Many people consider 'senior team' to be an oxymoron. Often there is more competition than real teamwork. Jostling for eventual advancement to the top position can compromise candid communication. Building a team from a group of "alpha dogs" requires clear commitment from the CEO. |
Holding the big picture |
Find some way to represent the entire enterprise to yourself. For example, a hierarchical graphic depiction of key work processes would enable you to locate problems in the life of the organization. You would be able to see the potential interdependencies of different problem solving efforts. |